The World's #1 Vacuum Cleaner Advice, Repair, Discussion & Information Forum
Well the DC07 filter should be cleaner than the DC04 one, maybe the DC07 cyclones need jet washing internally or something Also, i depends how old the DC07 is. IF it's a really late model with a number 2 by he oulet hole i's a cyclone where the filers stay cleaner for longer. Earlier models dont have as efficient cyclones for some reason. They may have no number or a number 1 by he rubber seal in the same place.I had a 2005 DC07 ORigin with a number 2 cyclone which was de rooted (large holes at the top of the cyclone to prevent clogging). We used that as our main vacuum every day for a few months and the cyclones were fantastic, the filter was spoless. I then decided to vacuum Shake N vac (not recommended)and the filter had some white powder on it afterwards from he fine dust of the freshener. Furthermore, the DC07 has a more powerful motor than the DC04 which produces more suction also. his means more air is being spun into he cyclones and a lot faster wiht the DC07 and the DC04 so I would say the DC07 is definitely better than the DC04 in pretty much every way (except the weight, noise level, bin capacity, post motor filter surface area and the weak bin flap pins & cyclone handle) Apart from that it's one of the best bagless vacuums in history every since bagless vacuums have come out PS I like your profile picture! Really nice
The Dyson geek knows it all! Interesting reading, nice bit of info
Yup, some reason they were upside down on the 07 but all Dysons have had them pointing down (dual cyclone and root cyclones) and all the modern ones such as the cinetic have it the right way aroung
Quote from: Parwaz7862 on June 03, 2016, 05:22:19 pmYup, some reason they were upside down on the 07 but all Dysons have had them pointing down (dual cyclone and root cyclones) and all the modern ones such as the cinetic have it the right way aroungDoes the cyclones work just as good as if they was like the DC14 or do they not as I personally don't see it being much different but I do think it may be better having it being small at the bottom and bigger at the top. Thanks
Quote from: dragoncurt on June 03, 2016, 10:21:04 pmQuote from: Parwaz7862 on June 03, 2016, 05:22:19 pmYup, some reason they were upside down on the 07 but all Dysons have had them pointing down (dual cyclone and root cyclones) and all the modern ones such as the cinetic have it the right way aroungDoes the cyclones work just as good as if they was like the DC14 or do they not as I personally don't see it being much different but I do think it may be better having it being small at the bottom and bigger at the top. ThanksI'm actually not too sure TBH sorry but they made cyclones smeller and smaller as they are more effective than larger ones. They called it Root cyclones because the large DC01 and DC04 cyclones were *square rooted* into Dc07 sized cyclones which is why it's called Root cyclone