The World's #1 Vacuum Cleaner Advice, Repair, Discussion & Information Forum

Author Topic: Why is Big Ball Animal 2 bad?  (Read 2648 times)

Offline Halcyon

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Country: 00
Why is Big Ball Animal 2 bad?
« on: August 19, 2019, 02:24:35 pm »
I've just been to John Lewis' and tried Big Ball Animal and Miele Blizzard.
I must say I really regret that I didn't get cylinder when I was buying a Dyson upright.
Don't really know why it's got so many bad reviews
It's not that heavy and bulky as Miele. It's much easier to empty it and the suction. No comparison, Dyson's better.
But Miele's better as you can adjust the suction and its floor heads are much better.
Dyson's feels really plastic and pet head is just so small and flimsy. Why did they change it for worse. Why didn't they make the head like cylinders in Japan that looks like cordless' one?
It's just really hard to understand.

Offline ryevac

  • Member
  • Posts: 626
  • Country: gb
  • Gender: Male
  • Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement
Re: Why is Big Ball Animal 2 bad?
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2019, 07:47:03 pm »
It's all about £

Dysons, older models still going strong - no manufacturer is going to sell more if the previous quality models last years.
The only way to fail is not to try.

Offline MVacs

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6424
  • Country: gb
  • Gender: Male
    • Manchester Vacs - The Independent Dyson Specialists
Re: Why is Big Ball Animal 2 bad?
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2019, 07:50:47 am »
I agree. Built in obsolescence on newer models. 

Dyson Cylinder Spare Parts


 

 

Trade Dyson Spare Parts

 

 

Dyson Spare Parts

 

 

Freestanding Dyson Cordless Vacuum Stand

 

 

Buy a Dyson DC04 Wand Handle

 

 

 

 

Buy a police truncheon

 

 

Instagram

Dyson Spares, Parts, Advice   Follow us on Twitter

Manchester Vacs on Instagram